EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6248R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6248R
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
23.40
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+103%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248R by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.0114.87
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Genoa
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,700$3,060
Current price$3465 (1.3x MSRP)$2995 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9274F has 49% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6248R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed3 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6248R 23.40
EPYC 9274F 47.50
+103%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248R by 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6248R 36186
EPYC 9274F 73463
+103%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248R by 103% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.40 47.50
Recency 24 February 2020 10 November 2022
Cost $2700 $3060
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 320 Watt

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6248R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6248R and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
Xeon Gold 6248R
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 43 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6248R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6248R or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.