Core i9-12900F vs Xeon Gold 6248

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6248
2019
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
19.08
Core i9-12900F
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
23.83
+24.9%

i9-12900F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking278193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.8551.32
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,072no data
Current price$1057 (0.3x MSRP)$424

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900F has 146% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6248.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4024
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.25 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache20 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache27.5 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6248 19.08
i9-12900F 23.83
+24.9%

Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248 by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6248 29504
i9-12900F 36864
+24.9%

Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon Gold 6248 by 25% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.08 23.83
Recency 2 April 2019 4 January 2022
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 24
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i9-12900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6248 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6248 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-12900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6248 and Core i9-12900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6248
Xeon Gold 6248
Intel Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 131 vote

Rate Core i9-12900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6248 or Core i9-12900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.