Xeon 6710E vs Gold 6246R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6246R
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
17.29
Xeon 6710E
2024
64 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
34.86
+102%

Xeon 6710E outperforms Xeon Gold 6246R by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking409116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9013.02
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency3.577.21
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6710E has 349% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6246R.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache1 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache35.75 MB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4888

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6246R 17.29
Xeon 6710E 34.86
+102%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6246R 30468
Samples: 6
Xeon 6710E 61404
+102%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.29 34.86
Recency 24 February 2020 3 June 2024
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 64

Xeon 6710E has a 101.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6710E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6246R in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 6246R
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6246R and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.