Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Gold 6246

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Gold 6246
2019
12 cores / 24 threads
15.80
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads
15.91
+0.7%

E5-2699A v4 outperforms Gold 6246 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking377368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation7.6517.03
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)25 October 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286$4,938
Current price$2260 (0.7x MSRP)$513 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 123% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6246.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads2444
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MB5.5 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB55 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB1.5 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6246 15.80
Xeon E5-2699A v4 15.91
+0.7%

E5-2699A v4 outperforms Gold 6246 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6246 24829
Xeon E5-2699A v4 25000
+0.7%

E5-2699A v4 outperforms Gold 6246 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 15.80 15.91
Recency 2 April 2019 25 October 2016
Physical cores 12 22
Threads 24 44
Cost $3286 $4938
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 145 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6246 and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 33 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6246 or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.