EPYC 7502 vs Xeon Gold 6246

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6246
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
16.05
EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.40
+89.4%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Xeon Gold 6246 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking388126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.597.47
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286$2,600
Current price$2260 (0.7x MSRP)$3299 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6246 has 2% better value for money than EPYC 7502.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6246 16.05
EPYC 7502 30.40
+89.4%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Xeon Gold 6246 by 89% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6246 24829
EPYC 7502 47021
+89.4%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Xeon Gold 6246 by 89% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.05 30.40
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Cost $3286 $2600
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 180 Watt

The EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6246 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6246 and EPYC 7502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246
AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6246 or EPYC 7502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.