EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6240

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads
17.98
EPYC 7552
2019
48 cores / 96 threads
32.53
+80.9%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon Gold 6240 by 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking296103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation7.2516.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,445$4,025
Current price$2870 (1.2x MSRP)$1739 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7552 has 125% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6240.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3696
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.125 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6240 17.98
EPYC 7552 32.53
+80.9%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon Gold 6240 by 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6240 28239
EPYC 7552 51104
+81%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon Gold 6240 by 81% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 17.98 32.53
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 18 48
Threads 36 96
Cost $2445 $4025
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6240 and EPYC 7552, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240
AMD EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6240 or EPYC 7552, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.