Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon Gold 6238R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6238R
2020, $2,612
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
19.71
+191%

Xeon Gold 6238R outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3451194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.3633.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Power efficiency12.8011.16
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date24 February 2020 (5 years ago)24 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3100 has 673% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6238R.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads568
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache1.75 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6238R 19.71
+191%
Ryzen 3 3100 6.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6238R 34751
+191%
Samples: 3
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
Samples: 1804

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.71 6.77
Recency 24 February 2020 24 April 2020
Physical cores 28 4
Threads 56 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6238R has a 191.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6238R is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6238R is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6238R
Xeon Gold 6238R
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6238R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1900 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6238R and Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.