EPYC 9654 vs Xeon Gold 6238

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Gold 6238
2019
22 cores / 44 threads
18.25
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
77.72
+326%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Gold 6238 by 326% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2864
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation10.5910.18
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Genoa
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612$11,805
Current price$2006 (0.8x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6238 has 4% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)96
Threads44192
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.375 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache22 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30.25 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6238 18.25
EPYC 9654 77.72
+326%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Gold 6238 by 326% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6238 28668
EPYC 9654 122091
+326%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Gold 6238 by 326% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 18.25 77.72
Recency 2 April 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 22 96
Threads 44 192
Cost $2612 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6238 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6238 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6238 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.