EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Gold 6238

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6238
2019
22 cores / 44 threads, 140 Watt
18.73
EPYC 4344P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
22.53
+20.3%

EPYC 4344P outperforms Xeon Gold 6238 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking332239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.9550.19
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency12.2031.61
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4344P has 358% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6238.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.375 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache22 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30.25 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6238 18.73
EPYC 4344P 22.53
+20.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6238 28668
EPYC 4344P 34474
+20.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.73 22.53
Recency 2 April 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 22 8
Threads 44 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6238 has 175% more physical cores and 175% more threads.

EPYC 4344P, on the other hand, has a 20.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4344P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6238 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6238 and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6238 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6238 or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.