Pentium Gold G6505 vs Xeon Gold 6230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6230
2019
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
16.99
+522%
Pentium Gold G6505
2021
2 cores / 4 threads, 58 Watt
2.73

Xeon Gold 6230 outperforms Pentium Gold G6505 by a whopping 522% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3791716
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.22no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency12.964.49
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Comet Lake-R (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,894$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads404
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.25 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache27.5 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471200
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6230 16.99
+522%
Pentium Gold G6505 2.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6230 27210
+523%
Pentium Gold G6505 4371

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.99 2.73
Recency 2 April 2019 16 March 2021
Physical cores 20 2
Threads 40 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 58 Watt

Xeon Gold 6230 has a 522.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

Pentium Gold G6505, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 115.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Gold G6505 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6230 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Gold G6505 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6230 and Pentium Gold G6505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6230
Xeon Gold 6230
Intel Pentium Gold G6505
Pentium Gold G6505

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 24 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate Pentium Gold G6505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6230 or Pentium Gold G6505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.