Atom N475 vs Xeon Gold 6230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6230
2019, $1,894
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
14.83
+14730%

Xeon Gold 6230 outperforms Atom N475 by a whopping 14730% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5713694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.84no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Atom
Power efficiency5.010.60
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date2 April 2019 (7 years ago)1 June 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,894$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads402
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.25 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache27.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size1 TB2 GB
Max memory channels61
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6230 14.83
+14730%
Atom N475 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6230 25956
+14401%
Samples: 14
Atom N475 179
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.83 0.10
Recency 2 April 2019 1 June 2010
Physical cores 20 1
Threads 40 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon Gold 6230 has a 14730% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N475, on the other hand, has 1983% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N475 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6230 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N475 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 28 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6230 and Atom N475, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.