Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs Xeon Gold 6144

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6144
2017, $2,925
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
10.23
+2279%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.43

Xeon Gold 6144 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 2279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8773200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.55no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Gold2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency7.31no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date11 July 2017 (8 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,925no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache512 KB256 KB
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR2
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6144 10.23
+2279%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 0.43

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 6144 1315
+535%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 6144 7921
+1800%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.23 0.43
Recency 11 July 2017 4 June 2008
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon Gold 6144 has a 2279.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, on the other hand, has 7400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6144 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6144 is a server/workstation processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6144
Xeon Gold 6144
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6144 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 37 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6144 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.