Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Xeon Gold 6144

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6144
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
12.59
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
16.61
+31.9%

Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon Gold 6144 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking616398
Place by popularitynot in top-10060
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0848.92
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency7.9414.97
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Vermeer (2020−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,925$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5700X3D has 1488% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6144.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data8,850 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6144 12.59
Ryzen 7 5700X3D 16.61
+31.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6144 19993
Ryzen 7 5700X3D 26386
+32%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.59 16.61
Recency 11 July 2017 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 7 5700X3D has a 31.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6144 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6144 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6144 and Ryzen 7 5700X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6144
Xeon Gold 6144
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6144 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1304 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6144 or Ryzen 7 5700X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.