Xeon Gold 6330H vs Gold 6138F
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Gold | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,767 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 40 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 20 | no data |
L1 cache | 1.25 MB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 20 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 27.5 MB | 33 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 87 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 4 |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 RDIMM |
Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 1.12 TB |
Max memory channels | 6 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 July 2017 | 6 April 2021 |
Physical cores | 20 | 24 |
Threads | 40 | 48 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 150 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6138F has 11.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6330H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138F and Xeon Gold 6330H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.