Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Xeon Gold 6138

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.57
+418%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.62

Xeon Gold 6138 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by a whopping 418% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5751868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency4.590.81
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date25 April 2017 (8 years ago)March 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads404
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1600 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1.25 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache20 MB12 MB (shared)
L3 cache27.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data55 °C
Number of transistorsno data820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt136 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6138 13.57
+418%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138 23850
+417%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.57 2.62
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 136 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138 has a 417.9% higher aggregate performance score, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 8.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6138 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6138 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 157 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6138 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 283 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6138 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.