i5-14400F vs Xeon Gold 5416S

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
22.65
+39.7%
Core i5-14400F
2024
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.21

Xeon Gold 5416S outperforms Core i5-14400F by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking230408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.9856.87
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.2923.60
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$944$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 13% better value for money than i5-14400F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F.

PCIe version55.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes8016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5416S 22.65
+39.7%
i5-14400F 16.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
+39.7%
i5-14400F 25744

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.65 16.21
Recency 10 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 5416S has a 39.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i5-14400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5416S is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-14400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5416S is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5416S and Core i5-14400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S
Intel Core i5-14400F
Core i5-14400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 554 votes

Rate Core i5-14400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5416S or Core i5-14400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.