Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon Gold 5320H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5320H
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
19.97
+38.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.43

Xeon Gold 5320H outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking279495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency12.6048.77
Architecture codenameCooper Lake-SP (2021)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4016 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache27.5 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketFCLGA4189FP8
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 RDIMMDDR5
Maximum memory size1.12 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5320H 19.97
+38.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5320H 31718
+38.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22919

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.97 14.43
Recency 6 April 2021 1 October 2024
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 40 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon Gold 5320H has a 38.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 435.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5320H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5320H and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5320H
Xeon Gold 5320H
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5320H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5320H or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.