i5-13600KF vs Xeon Gold 5320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5320
2021
26 cores / 52 threads, 185 Watt
23.73
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.90
+0.7%

Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon Gold 5320 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking214212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.34
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency12.0912.44
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores26 (Hexacosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads5220
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache39 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5320 23.73
i5-13600KF 23.90
+0.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5320 37558
i5-13600KF 37819
+0.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.73 23.90
Recency 6 April 2021 27 September 2022
Physical cores 26 14
Threads 52 20
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 5320 has 85.7% more physical cores and 160% more threads.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 48% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5320 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5320 and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5320
Xeon Gold 5320
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1845 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5320 or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.