Ryzen 3 5425U vs Xeon Gold 5318Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.75
+194%

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms Ryzen 3 5425U by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking256984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency12.0244.98
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FP6
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 21.75
+194%
Ryzen 3 5425U 7.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283
+194%
Ryzen 3 5425U 11329

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.75 7.40
Recency 6 April 2021 6 January 2022
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Gold 5318Y has a 193.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ryzen 3 5425U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1000% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5425U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5425U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5318Y and Ryzen 3 5425U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
Ryzen 3 5425U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 225 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5425U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5318Y or Ryzen 3 5425U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.