i9-14900KF vs Xeon Gold 5318H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5318H
2021
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
18.45
Core i9-14900KF
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.45
+103%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon Gold 5318H by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.64
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency11.5828.21
Architecture codenameCooper Lake-SP (2021)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 RDIMMDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.12 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5318H 18.45
i9-14900KF 37.45
+103%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5318H 29301
i9-14900KF 59484
+103%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.45 37.45
Recency 6 April 2021 17 October 2023
Physical cores 18 24
Threads 36 32
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 5318H has 12.5% more threads.

i9-14900KF, on the other hand, has a 103% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5318H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5318H is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5318H and Core i9-14900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Xeon Gold 5318H
Intel Core i9-14900KF
Core i9-14900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 343 votes

Rate Core i9-14900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5318H or Core i9-14900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.