EPYC 4124P vs Xeon Gold 5218R

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5218R
2020
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
15.58
+32.8%
EPYC 4124P
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
11.73

Xeon Gold 5218R outperforms EPYC 4124P by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking440658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.6149.74
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.8017.08
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,273$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4124P has 130% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5218R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.25 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache27.5 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5218R 15.58
+32.8%
EPYC 4124P 11.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5218R 24742
+32.8%
EPYC 4124P 18637

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.58 11.73
Recency 24 February 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 5218R has a 32.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

EPYC 4124P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5218R is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4124P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5218R and EPYC 4124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5218R or EPYC 4124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.