Xeon Gold 6252N vs Gold 5218N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Gold | Intel Xeon Gold |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,375 | $4,259 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 23 | 23 |
L1 cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 22 MB | 35.75 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | 74 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | 6 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
Threads | 32 | 48 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5218N has 36.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6252N, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5218N and Xeon Gold 6252N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.