FX-9830P vs Xeon Gold 5122

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5122
2017, $1,221
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
5.07
+168%

Xeon Gold 5122 outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14272203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.042.28
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date25 April 2017 (9 years ago)31 May 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,221no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache256 KB320 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per module)
L3 cache16.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 5122 5.07
+168%
FX-9830P 1.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5122 8875
+168%
Samples: 37
FX-9830P 3306
Samples: 175

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 5122 1192
+94.5%
FX-9830P 613

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 5122 4320
+195%
FX-9830P 1465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.07 1.89
Recency 25 April 2017 31 May 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 5122 has a 168% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9830P, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5122 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5122 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5122 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 118 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 5122 and FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.