Core 2 Extreme QX6850 vs Xeon Gold 5118
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5118 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by a whopping 626% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 747 | 2188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.14 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 9.43 | 1.05 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,273 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16.5 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.46 | 1.44 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5118 has a 626.4% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 23.8% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Gold 5118 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5118 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX6850 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5118 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
