Celeron N2806 vs Xeon Gold 5118
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5118 outperforms Celeron N2806 by a whopping 3293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 940 | 3393 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.09 | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 9.70 | 7.51 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 December 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,273 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 5118 has 10800% better value for money than Celeron N2806.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 23 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16.5 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 756 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Celeron N2806.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.50 | 0.28 |
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 1 December 2013 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 4 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5118 has a 3292.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N2806, on the other hand, has 2525% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5118 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N2806 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5118 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2806 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
