i9-13700HX vs Xeon E7520
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Raptor Lake-HX |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7520 and Core i9-13700HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.87 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 cache | 18 MB L3 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7520 and Core i9-13700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCLGA1567 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7520 and Core i9-13700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7520 and Core i9-13700HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7520 and Core i9-13700HX are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon E7520 has 31.6% lower power consumption.
i9-13700HX, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E7520 and Intel Core i9-13700HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E7520 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13700HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
