Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Xeon E7450
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 outperforms Xeon E7450 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1351 | 783 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.66 | 17.72 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7450 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.5 GHz |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L3 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.45V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7450 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7450 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7450 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7450 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.67 | 11.76 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a 107% higher aggregate performance score, and 221% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E7450 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E7450 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
