EPYC 7643P vs Xeon E7450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7450
2008
90 Watt
5.63
EPYC 7643P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
43.82
+678%

EPYC 7643P outperforms Xeon E7450 by a whopping 678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking124757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.55
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.658.26
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 July 2008 (17 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,722

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threadsno data96
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L3 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.45Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA604SP3
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E7450 5.63
EPYC 7643P 43.82
+678%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E7450 9932
EPYC 7643P 77307
+678%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.63 43.82
Recency 1 July 2008 5 September 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon E7450 has 150% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7643P, on the other hand, has a 678.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7643P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E7450 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7450
Xeon E7450
AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E7450 and EPYC 7643P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.