EPYC 9565 vs Xeon E7430
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Dunnington (2008) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 15 September 2008 (16 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,391 | $10,486 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.15 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.13 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 503 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,900 million | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.45V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
| Socket | PGA604 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7430 and EPYC 9565.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 September 2008 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 72 |
| Threads | 4 | 144 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 400 Watt |
Xeon E7430 has 344.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9565, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 1700% more physical cores and 3500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E7430 and AMD EPYC 9565. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
