Intel Xeon E7340 vs AMD EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7H12
45.34
+964%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7340 by 964% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking391262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.01no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)no data
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years old)1 July 2007 (16 years old)
Current price$6796 $54
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)no data
Threads128no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm65 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.34
+964%
Xeon E7340 4.26

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7340 by 964% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+964%
Xeon E7340 6544

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7340 by 964% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.34 4.26
Recency 18 September 2019 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 80 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon E7340
Xeon E7340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Intel Xeon E7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon E7340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.