Xeon X7350 vs E7220
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1448 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.13 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.45 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Tigerton (2007) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) | 6 September 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,301 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 0.93 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 64 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.5V | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 |
| Socket | PPGA604 | PGA604,PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | + |
| FSB parity | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7220 and Xeon X7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 6 September 2007 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon E7220 has 62.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon X7350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E7220 and Intel Xeon X7350. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
