Xeon Platinum 8358 vs E7-8890 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.35
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
35.63
+2539%

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 2539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2251108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E7no data
Power efficiency0.7412.97
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,174no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate3 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache60 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size3 TB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3264

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.35
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.63
+2539%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+2549%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 35.63
Recency 20 June 2016 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 51.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8358, on the other hand, has a 2539.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8890 v4 and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8890 v4 or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.