Core i5-11400F vs Xeon E7-8880 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8880 v3
2015
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
11.79
+6.8%

Xeon E7-8880 v3 outperforms Core i5-11400F by a small 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking609649
Place by popularitynot in top-10033
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.1264.94
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameHaswell-EX (2015)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$157
Current price$98 $121 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-11400F has 1981% better value for money than Xeon E7-8880 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration81
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
PAE46 Bitno data
Instruction Replay-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8880 v3 11.79
+6.8%
i5-11400F 11.04

Xeon E7-8880 v3 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E7-8880 v3 18244
+6.8%
i5-11400F 17082

Xeon E7-8880 v3 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.79 11.04
Recency 1 June 2015 16 March 2021
Physical cores 18 6
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8880 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3
Xeon E7-8880 v3
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8880 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 7977 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8880 v3 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.