Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Xeon E7-8880 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8880 v3
2015
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
11.49
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
2023
10 cores / 10 threads, 2424 Watt
13.70
+19.2%

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core outperforms Xeon E7-8880 v3 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking677537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency7.77no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EX (2015)no data
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3610
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)7.3 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt2424 ‑ 3696 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes32no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8880 v3 11.49
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 13.70
+19.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8880 v3 18244
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21758
+19.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.49 13.70
Recency 1 June 2015 17 January 2023
Physical cores 18 10
Threads 36 10
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 2424 Watt

Xeon E7-8880 v3 has 80% more physical cores and 260% more threads, and 1516% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8880 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8880 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8880 v3 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3
Xeon E7-8880 v3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8880 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 111 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8880 v3 or Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.