Xeon E5-1691 V3 vs E7-4890 v3

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameHaswell-EX (2015)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads3628
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)35 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2356 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
Socket11502011-3
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2133

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2015 8 September 2014
Physical cores 18 14
Threads 36 28
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 135 Watt

Xeon E7-4890 v3 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 28.6% more physical cores and 28.6% more threads.

Xeon E5-1691 V3, on the other hand, has 22.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-4890 v3 and Xeon E5-1691 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-4890 v3
Xeon E7-4890 v3
Intel Xeon E5-1691 V3
Xeon E5-1691 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7-4890 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 18 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1691 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-4890 v3 or Xeon E5-1691 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.