Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
19.85
+58.3%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.54

Xeon E7-4890 v2 outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking287618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency11.8938.82
Architecture codenameno dataLunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores15 (Pentadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads308
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache37.5 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes324

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 19.85
+58.3%
Ultra 9 288V 12.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-4890 v2 30946
+58.4%
Ultra 9 288V 19542

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.85 12.54
Recency 1 January 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 15 8
Threads 30 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon E7-4890 v2 has a 58.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% more physical cores and 275% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 416.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-4890 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2
Xeon E7-4890 v2
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Xeon E7-4890 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-4890 v2 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.