FX-6130 vs Xeon E5645

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5645
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
2.80
+13.8%

Xeon E5645 outperforms FX-6130 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18681947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.491.10
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date16 March 2010 (15 years ago)23 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5645 and FX-6130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads126
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5645 and FX-6130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5645 and FX-6130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5645 and FX-6130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5645 and FX-6130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5645 and FX-6130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5645 and FX-6130.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5645 2.80
+13.8%
FX-6130 2.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5645 4942
+13.5%
Samples: 111
FX-6130 4353
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.80 2.46
Recency 16 March 2010 23 October 2012
Threads 12 6
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5645 has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 18.8% lower power consumption.

FX-6130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Intel Xeon E5645 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-6130 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5645 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6130 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5645
Xeon E5645
AMD FX-6130
FX-6130

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 64 votes

Rate Xeon E5645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5645 and FX-6130, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.