Xeon E3120 vs E5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5640
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.39
+163%

E5640 outperforms E3120 by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17032440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.850.06
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5640 has 1317% better value for money than Xeon E3120.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed2.666 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5640 2.39
+163%
Xeon E3120 0.91

E5640 outperforms E3120 by 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5640 3702
+163%
Xeon E3120 1408

E5640 outperforms E3120 by 163% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.39 0.91
Recency 16 March 2010 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5640 has a 162.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon E3120, on the other hand, has 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5640 and Xeon E3120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5640
Xeon E5640
Intel Xeon E3120
Xeon E3120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 34 votes

Rate Xeon E5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5640 or Xeon E3120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.