Xeon X7560 vs E5620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.27

X7560 outperforms E5620 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17361124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.086.60
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data
Current price$52 (1.5x MSRP)$87

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X7560 has 8150% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.67 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)24 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA1567,FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5620 2.27
Xeon X7560 5.24
+131%

X7560 outperforms E5620 by 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5620 3516
Xeon X7560 8110
+131%

X7560 outperforms E5620 by 131% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 5.24
Recency 16 March 2010 1 January 2010
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon X7560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Xeon X7560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
Intel Xeon X7560
Xeon X7560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Xeon X7560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Xeon X7560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.