Xeon X5698 vs E5620

General info

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1699	1708
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.08	0.11
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date	16 March 2010 (14 years old)	14 February 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$35	no data
Current price	$40 (1.1x MSRP)	$997

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5698 has 38% better value for money than Xeon E5620.

Technical specs

Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.66 GHz	4.4 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	12 MB (shared)	12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	239 mm2	239 mm2
Maximum core temperature	78 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,170 million	1,170 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	1366
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	40 Bit	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	288 GB	no data
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698.

PCIe version

2.0

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E5620 outperforms X5698 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	2.29	2.25
Recency	16 March 2010	14 February 2011
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	8	4
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	130 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Xeon X5698, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---