Pentium Dual T3400 vs Xeon E5620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.26
+438%
Pentium Dual Core T3400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42

Xeon E5620 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3400 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18272989
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency2.671.14
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5620 2.26
+438%
Pentium Dual T3400 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5620 3592
+442%
Pentium Dual T3400 663

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 0.42
Recency 16 March 2010 1 October 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5620 has a 438.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T3400, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5620 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T3400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Pentium Dual Core T3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
Pentium Dual Core T3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 128 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 65 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Pentium Dual Core T3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.