Xeon Gold 6246 vs E5520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.59
Xeon Gold 6246
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 165 Watt
15.63
+883%

Xeon Gold 6246 outperforms Xeon E5520 by a whopping 883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2096434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.586.95
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency1.888.96
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$19$3,286

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6246 has 169% better value for money than Xeon E5520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24.75 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C76 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size144 GB1 TB
Max memory channels36
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5520 1.59
Xeon Gold 6246 15.63
+883%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5520 2529
Xeon Gold 6246 24829
+882%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 15.63
Recency 30 March 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E5520 has 106.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6246, on the other hand, has a 883% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6246 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5520 and Xeon Gold 6246, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520
Intel Xeon Gold 6246
Xeon Gold 6246

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5520 or Xeon Gold 6246, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.