FX-8140 vs Xeon E5520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.63

FX-8140 outperforms Xeon E5520 by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5520 and FX-8140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20561591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.58no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$19no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5520 and FX-8140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5520 and FX-8140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5520 and FX-8140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5520 and FX-8140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5520 and FX-8140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5520 and FX-8140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5520 and FX-8140.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5520 1.63
FX-8140 3.14
+92.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5520 2524
FX-8140 4860
+92.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 3.14
Recency 30 March 2009 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5520 has 18.8% lower power consumption.

FX-8140, on the other hand, has a 92.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-8140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5520 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8140 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5520 and FX-8140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520
AMD FX-8140
FX-8140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 51 vote

Rate FX-8140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5520 or FX-8140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.