EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon E5502

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5502
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.55
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.76
+8038%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon E5502 by a whopping 8038% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking285250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.93
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.6314.58
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$95$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data29.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size263 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366SP3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size144 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5502 0.55
EPYC 75F3 44.76
+8038%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5502 837
EPYC 75F3 68505
+8085%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 44.76
Recency 30 March 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon E5502 has 250% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 8038.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5502 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5502 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5502
Xeon E5502
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5502 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.