A8-3820 vs Xeon E5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5450
2007
1.66
+17.7%

Xeon E5450 outperforms A8-3820 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5450 and A8-3820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19602102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.050.07
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataLlano (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$62 $254

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-3820 has 40% better value for money than Xeon E5450.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5450 and A8-3820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5450 and A8-3820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FM1
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5450 and A8-3820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5450 and A8-3820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5450 and A8-3820 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5450 and A8-3820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6550D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5450 1.66
+17.7%
A8-3820 1.41

Xeon E5450 outperforms A8-3820 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5450 2569
+18.2%
A8-3820 2174

Xeon E5450 outperforms A8-3820 by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5450 384
+28.4%
A8-3820 299

Xeon E5450 outperforms A8-3820 by 28% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5450 1089
+19.4%
A8-3820 912

Xeon E5450 outperforms A8-3820 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 1.41
Recency 1 October 2007 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation processor while A8-3820 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5450 and A8-3820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450
AMD A8-3820
A8-3820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1215 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 47 votes

Rate A8-3820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5450 or A8-3820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.