Phenom II X2 545 vs Xeon E5440

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5440
2008
80 Watt
1.49
+93.5%
Phenom II X2 545
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.77

Xeon E5440 outperforms Phenom II X2 545 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21442634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.38
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.760.91
Architecture codenameno dataCallisto (2009−2010)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.83 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache6 MB (per core)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data258 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771AM3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5440 1.49
+93.5%
Phenom II X2 545 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5440 2374
+94.3%
Phenom II X2 545 1222

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5440 367
Phenom II X2 545 406
+10.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5440 1029
+42.3%
Phenom II X2 545 723

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 0.77
Recency 1 January 2008 1 June 2009

Xeon E5440 has a 93.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Phenom II X2 545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon E5440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X2 545 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X2 545 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Phenom II X2 545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440
AMD Phenom II X2 545
Phenom II X2 545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 485 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 51 vote

Rate Phenom II X2 545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5440 or Phenom II X2 545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.