EPYC 9335 vs Xeon E5440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2477not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.71no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)Turin (2024)
Release date11 November 2007 (18 years ago)10 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$690$3,178

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.83 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size2x 107 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5440 2367
Samples: 533
EPYC 9335 65811
+2680%
Samples: 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2007 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 210 Watt

Xeon E5440 has 163% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5440 and AMD EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 527 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5440 and EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.