Core 2 Duo E4600 vs Xeon E5440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5440
2008
80 Watt
1.53
+200%

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20292761
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataAllendale (2006−2009)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)October 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$90 $63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data111 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data167 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5440 1.53
+200%
Core 2 Duo E4600 0.51

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5440 2374
+202%
Core 2 Duo E4600 785

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 202% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5440 361
+68.7%
Core 2 Duo E4600 214

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 69% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5440 1052
+210%
Core 2 Duo E4600 339

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 210% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 0.51
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E4600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Duo E4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
Core 2 Duo E4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 445 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 189 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5440 or Core 2 Duo E4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.