A4-4020 vs Xeon E5335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5335
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
0.98
+22.5%
A4-4020
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80

Xeon E5335 outperforms A4-4020 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5335 and A4-4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24772604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.161.16
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date14 November 2006 (18 years ago)January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5335 and A4-4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K
L2 cache4 MB (per die)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °C70 °C
Number of transistors582 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
VID voltage range1V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5335 and A4-4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA771,PLGA771FM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5335 and A4-4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5335 and A4-4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5335 and A4-4020 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5335 and A4-4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR3-1333

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 7480D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5335 and A4-4020.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5335 0.98
+22.5%
A4-4020 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5335 1549
+22.2%
A4-4020 1268

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 0.80
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5335 has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-4020, on the other hand, has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5335 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5335 is a server/workstation processor while A4-4020 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5335 and A4-4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5335
Xeon E5335
AMD A4-4020
A4-4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate A4-4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5335 or A4-4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.