i3-10100F vs Xeon E5205

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5205
2007
65 Watt
0.53
Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.53
+943%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Xeon E5205 by a whopping 943% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28541147
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.12
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.778.02
Architecture codenameno dataComet Lake (2020)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)12 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache6 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.212Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5205 0.53
i3-10100F 5.53
+943%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5205 838
i3-10100F 8757
+945%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 5.53
Recency 1 October 2007 12 October 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

i3-10100F has a 943.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5205 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5205 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-10100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5205 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5205
Xeon E5205
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7563 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5205 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.